 | | Re: Addresses —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | (...) Why? I don't get the concern. I'm more concerned about my email address than my postal address. (...) For different reasons and in different ways I appreciate the idea of having some semi-automated double blind doohicky and also just having no (...) (26 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Addresses —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | | I agree that it's not a critical concern for most people. The main advantage is a smooth and reliable system to avoid the redundant and inefficient "someone send me an address" posts. Of course, whenever you implement a system that holds a users (...) (26 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Which junk mail is more evil? (Was: Addresses) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | (...) Truly a sign of the times. I'm much, much more concerned about throwing away junk snail mail -- and the paper that goes into that waste -- than I am about someone stealing Internet bandwidth and wasting my time. Plus, I'm not too keen about (...) (26 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Addresses —Tamyra Teed ("Mookie")
|
| | | | Besides... doesn't a almost complete list already exist?? of course it's in Todd's computer :) I can see the need for some type of prg'ing to be done as far as listing address's and mailing them out for the next person.. though I don't see the need (...) (26 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
