 | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops —Scott Arthur
|
| | | Wow. 2500+ words! Is an executive summery available? (...) IMHO this whole thing should have stayed private. Scott A PS Was cross posting to .general really req'd? (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.market.brickshops, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) What I find really sad in all of this is, though you're toeing a line and being consistent in your arguments, you're *really* using this incident as an opportunity to stick it to Larry. Pathetic, but expected. -Tim (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.market.brickshops, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | (...) Yeah, I was just thinking the same thing. Scott, you ought to be ashamed. Chris (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops- —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) If you mean I'm not brown-nosing Larry: you are correct! However, read my posts; you'll see that all I'm doing is urging for some realism. I'm not suggesting Larry be banned for life or anything silly like that. Nor am I suggesting that Dan is (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops- —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) Rarely, anymore. Why? Chris (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) I'm not sure I agree; I wish this whole thing had stayed private. That said, think about this: what do you think Larry would have done if the tables were turned? Scott A (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.market.brickshops, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | (canceled) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) I believe honestly that if Larry saw exactly what played out leading up to his banning happen to you or Richard, he would support reinstating the banned member because of their earnest attempt to act in good faith in the situation (regardless (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.market.brickshops, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
