| |
In lugnet.market.brickshops, Scott Arthur wrote:
> In lugnet.market.brickshops, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > In lugnet.market.brickshops, Scott Arthur wrote:
> > >
> > > Wow. 2500+ words! Is an executive summery available?
> > >
> > >
> > > > I have asked Dan privately to be
> > > > reinstated.
> > >
> > > IMHO this whole thing should have stayed private.
> > >
> > > Scott A
> > >
> > > PS Was cross posting to .general really req'd?
> >
> > What I find really sad in all of this is, though you're toeing a line and being
> > consistent in your arguments, you're *really* using this incident as an
> > opportunity to stick it to Larry. Pathetic, but expected.
>
>
> I'm not sure I agree; I wish this whole thing had stayed private.
>
> That said, think about this: what do you think Larry would have done if the
> tables were turned?
I believe honestly that if Larry saw exactly what played out leading up to his
banning happen to you or Richard, he would support reinstating the banned member
because of their earnest attempt to act in good faith in the situation
(regardless of that person's history one way or another).
Call me whatever you want for believing that, I don't really care. I know Larry
well and I stand by his character.
-Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
