Subject:
|
Re: suspended Bricklink shops-
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:55:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1697 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
> In lugnet.market.brickshops, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > In lugnet.market.brickshops, Scott Arthur wrote:
> > >
> > > Wow. 2500+ words! Is an executive summery available?
> > >
> > > IMHO this whole thing should have stayed private.
>
> > What I find really sad in all of this is, though you're toeing a line and being
> > consistent in your arguments, you're *really* using this incident as an
> > opportunity to stick it to Larry. Pathetic, but expected.
>
> Yeah, I was just thinking the same thing. Scott, you ought to be ashamed.
If you mean I'm not brown-nosing Larry: you are correct!
However, read my posts; you'll see that all I'm doing is urging for some
realism. I'm not suggesting Larry be banned for life or anything silly like
that. Nor am I suggesting that Dan is crazy, dictatorial or even blasphemous.
I'm somewhere in the middle.
Perhaps if more people were beside me in the middle-ground, this thread would be
a lot less confrontational!
Scott A
PS do you ever post outside .debate?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
