To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.market.auctionOpen lugnet.market.auction in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Marketplace / Auctions / 840
839  |  841
Subject: 
which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.market.auction
Date: 
Thu, 4 Mar 1999 23:48:20 GMT
Viewed: 
1397 times
  
Hello Lugnet auction participants:

As you might have noticed, I took the liberty of responding to
this Lugnet auction thread with an offer to sell at a lesser price.
(The thread was "Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge")
I knew this might annoy the auctioneer, but I didn't think
it was unethical or discourteous, just competitive.
What do you all think?

Steve Scott wrote:

A.  If you want to sell something start your own thread.
B.  If you must butt-in on mine, at least have the courtesy to wait until my
auction has closed.

My current position is that there are multiple sellers and buyers
in Lugnet, that all threads are available to all, and that
artificially keeping the price high for one seller by waiting
for the auction to finish is worse for the community than
is bringing out the set when the price exceeds my sell price.

However, I am willing to change my opinion if there
is a consensus here that what I have done is unethical.

Thank you for your comments,
/Eric McCarthy/
bendyarm@aol.com



Message has 6 Replies:
  Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
 
(...) I think the only one who could determine if it is unethical would be Todd, since this is his site, he's the one who determines what is and isn't "right" on it. (That being said) I don't think it is unethical. BMS, (1) unethical would be (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
 
(...) I agree with you. (...) You're in the right. (...) If I were you I wouldn't be willing to change my opinion no matter what anyone else says, but you've obviously gotten the support of the majority of the people who have responded to this (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
  Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
 
(...) I wouldn't say it was unethical but I think it would have been more courteous as well as responsible to start a separate thread. While no one "owns" a particular thread, auction threads usually only have one purpose - to announce and update (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
  Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
 
Ok, I've slept on it and am less angry than I was last night. Apologies for getting personal with the "parasite" comment, but I was annoyed as you clearly expected that I would be. Even in your own words, you "took a liberty" and that is the basis (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
 
This practice is called "Bid Siphoning." While it might be "good" for buyers, it _is_ discourteous, and is specifically forbid in most auction venues. From eBay's rules: "You may not email bidders in a currently open auction being run by a different (...) (26 years ago, 6-Mar-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
  Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
 
(...) Although, strictly speaking, it is unnecessary to jump into the middle of an auction thread in order to sell an item similar to what is being sold on that thread, once could easily argue that doing so adds value to the overall usefulness of (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.market.auction)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge
 
Three points of principal here: A. If you want to sell something start your own thread. B. If you must butt-in on mine, at least have the courtesy to wait until my auction has closed. C. See A. Thank you. [SteveScott] Eric (Parasite) McCarthy wrote (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.market.auction)

101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR