Subject:
|
which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.auction
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Mar 1999 23:48:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1470 times
|
| |
| |
Hello Lugnet auction participants:
As you might have noticed, I took the liberty of responding to
this Lugnet auction thread with an offer to sell at a lesser price.
(The thread was "Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge")
I knew this might annoy the auctioneer, but I didn't think
it was unethical or discourteous, just competitive.
What do you all think?
Steve Scott wrote:
> A. If you want to sell something start your own thread.
> B. If you must butt-in on mine, at least have the courtesy to wait until my
> auction has closed.
My current position is that there are multiple sellers and buyers
in Lugnet, that all threads are available to all, and that
artificially keeping the price high for one seller by waiting
for the auction to finish is worse for the community than
is bringing out the set when the price exceeds my sell price.
However, I am willing to change my opinion if there
is a consensus here that what I have done is unethical.
Thank you for your comments,
/Eric McCarthy/
bendyarm@aol.com
|
|
Message has 6 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge
|
| Three points of principal here: A. If you want to sell something start your own thread. B. If you must butt-in on mine, at least have the courtesy to wait until my auction has closed. C. See A. Thank you. [SteveScott] Eric (Parasite) McCarthy wrote (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
101 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|