| |
So does that mean that it would be worth it for you to just sell me one or
two of them for $30 each (that way you'd get even more than you'd get on
ebay--of course I know they are going for more than that..but they are worth
30 dollars to you)
In lugnet.market.auction, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> Right. I set the starting price where I do because that's the minimum
> I'll take to walk up buyers. If they go unbid, they go unbid, so the
> market still has a chance to speak to me (and further, I get punished
> because I have to pay the listing fee anyway, sold or not, and I pay
> more to list at 30 than I do at 1 dollar)
>
> Seriously, if I ended up not selling any more than I have so far that's
> OK with me, they're worth 30 each to me.
>
> --
> Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
> - - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
> fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
>
> NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: FA(eBay): blue hoppers
|
| (...) No. 30 is the price at which I keep them. There is hysteresis here. The price I pay for one and the price I would sell one for differ. In other words, if anyone has blue hoppers they don't want and want to sell them to me, 30 is the very MOST (...) (25 years ago, 12-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.theory)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: FA(eBay): blue hoppers
|
| (...) Right. I set the starting price where I do because that's the minimum I'll take to walk up buyers. If they go unbid, they go unbid, so the market still has a chance to speak to me (and further, I get punished because I have to pay the listing (...) (25 years ago, 12-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.theory)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
