| |
Replying to my own post ...
Probably the single most important decision to made is on modular tables.
To do this right means making a sound decision and learning from the two
active train groups (GMTLC and PNTLC). Since I there is no way I could do a
module of 20K-40K bricks, I think the GMTLC modules are out of the question
but I have looked at the PNTLC web site and think their ideas have a lot of
merit. Going with someone elses standard makes a whole lot of sense to me.
Mike
Mike Walsh wrote in message ...
> Tomorrow is no good for me. Next week would be good as I am on vacation • all
> week. Not going anywhere but not going to work either!
>
> Mike - mike_walsh@mindspring.com
>
> James Beerman wrote in message ...
> > In lugnet.loc.us.nc.ral, Frank Filz writes:
> > > James Beerman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In lugnet.loc.us.nc.ral, Mike Walsh writes:
> > > > > I have taken my son to the train show each of the last two years. • Last
> > year
> > > > > it was pretty lame, the year before it was pretty good. The number of
> > > > > layouts on display last year went down signigicantly, I don't know • why.
> > The
> > > > > show tends to be half flea market and half layouts. Last year it • seemed to
> > > > > me that the flea market portion of the show was much more dominant • than
> the
> > > > > layout.
> > > > >
> > > > > Someone would need to take the lead on this as I don't have the • bandwidth
> > to
> > > > > do it myself. I'm not sure how much I could participate either other • than
> > > > > building some buildings for a layout. My wife and I are having • another
> > baby
> > > > > and that weekend is very close to the due date. I am somewhat • reluctant to
> > > > > make much of a commitment because I may not be able to keep it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike - mike_walsh@mindspring.com
> > > > > http://members.tripod.com/mike_walsh
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Maybe we should get together and discuss what each of us could • contribute.
> > >
> > > I could certainly supply trains and track, and some structures. I
> > > currently don't have the resources to build modular tables, but that
> > > could possibly change by the show date (I plan on buying a house in the
> > > next few months).
> > >
> > > A meeting would be good, though we may not get too much decided....
> > >
> > > --
> > > Frank Filz
> > >
> > > -----------------------------
> > > Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com
> > > Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
> >
> >
> > I might be able to come up with tables.
> >
> > I can meet tomorrow, at my place if you like, but then not again
> > until two weeks from today.
> >
> > Jimmy
>
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: meeting (was Re: train club)
|
| Mike Walsh wrote in message ... (...) a (...) I agree with Mike, lets go with the PNLTC tables (I think the California folks are going to use this standard also). If we can get together sometime to do an assembly line construction, I'd be happy to (...) (25 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.nc.ral, lugnet.loc.us.nc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: meeting (was Re: train club)
|
| Tomorrow is no good for me. Next week would be good as I am on vacation all week. Not going anywhere but not going to work either! Mike - mike_walsh@mindspring.com James Beerman wrote in message ... (...) seemed to (...) the (...) bandwidth (...) (...) (25 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.nc.ral, lugnet.loc.us.nc)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
