| |
I did not see the 4560 set in Sweden, only 4561. I'm not sure luggging a
train set back would be very easy either! Those boxes are pretty large. I
will take a look while I am there and let you know. I learned from my last
trip, I will throw an extra duffle bag (empty) in my luggage to haul any
loot back home with me!
Mike - mike_walsh@mindspring.com
Frank Filz wrote in message ...
>
> Mike Walsh wrote in message ...
> > Replying to my own post ...
> >
> > Probably the single most important decision to made is on modular tables.
> > To do this right means making a sound decision and learning from the two
> > active train groups (GMTLC and PNTLC). Since I there is no way I could do • a
> > module of 20K-40K bricks, I think the GMTLC modules are out of the • question
> > but I have looked at the PNTLC web site and think their ideas have a lot • of
> > merit. Going with someone elses standard makes a whole lot of sense to • me.
>
>
> I agree with Mike, lets go with the PNLTC tables (I think the California
> folks are going to use this standard also). If we can get together sometime
> to do an assembly line construction, I'd be happy to pay for a share of the
> materials. I could probably set the tables on top of my current set up, or
> just replace it. A group of us could probably knock together a bunch of
> tables in an afternoon.
>
> As far as train stuff to actually supply, I've got 2 pr switches and a • horde
> of track, 2 controllers (probably soon to be a 3rd, I'm probably going to
> bite for one of the new trains (Mike, if the version without controller is
> available in Sweden, I'd be interested in you picking me up one, looking at
> the parts I think I'd be interested in 2 but I don't need 4 controllers)),6
> motors (currently my two large engines use 2 motors each), quite a few • cars,
> and I could easily cover several modules with structures and scenery.
>
>
> > Mike Walsh wrote in message ...
> > > Tomorrow is no good for me. Next week would be good as I am on vacation • all
> > > week. Not going anywhere but not going to work either!
>
>
> Tomorrow doesn't work for me either.
>
> Frank
>
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: meeting (was Re: train club)
|
| Mike Walsh wrote in message ... (...) a (...) I agree with Mike, lets go with the PNLTC tables (I think the California folks are going to use this standard also). If we can get together sometime to do an assembly line construction, I'd be happy to (...) (25 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.nc.ral, lugnet.loc.us.nc)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
