 | | Re: All UK Groups subscribed? —Duane Hess
|
| | | (...) OK, this post obviously wasn't heeded. >-( I was patient enough to see that Richard did apologize for doing this though. His neck is in Todd's hands now, so I'll let Todd deal with him. However, is there any way to clean up the traffic page in (...) (26 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: All UK Groups subscribed? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) No (sorry) the best I can do is to delete all of the spammed messages, but I can't reset the article counts in the ng's or else it will screw up peoples' newsreader counts. --Todd (26 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: All UK Groups subscribed? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Actually, I think I may to have to figure out a way to revert the article counts all back to 2 after all, in order to clean up this situation most properly. Check out what happened: (URL) all of the numbers to the right of the names were blank (...) (26 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: All UK Groups subscribed? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, I've thought about this more, and there's really nothing I can do (that's 100% safe) to correct the problem with the article counts. They simply permeate the system too deeply, and it would take many hours of grueling fancy-footwork to (...) (26 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: All UK Groups subscribed? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Naw, nobody's in trouble... Richard and Simon were just trying to be helpful. I just reckon there are much cleaner solutions. --Todd (26 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: All UK Groups subscribed? —Richard Dee
|
| | | | On Wed, 12 May 1999 22:32:31 GMT, Duane Hess uttered the following profundities... (...) I deeply regret my actions. There were far-ranging implications which I hadn't even thought about. I feel even more deeply regretful for anyone who might have (...) (26 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | |
