 | | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
(...) This makes me very, very unhappy. It also settles the question of what the neo-375 windows would look like, I think. -LFB (22 years ago, 16-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
another image has popped up. (URL) Edwards ~~ (URL) ~ Edwards-Parts (URL) ~ Kanohi-Power.com ~~ "Hjalmar Haagsman" <hjalmar.haagsman@zonnet.nl> wrote in message news:GxsLr0.4wC@lugnet.com... (...) yet (...) (URL) As soon as more information becomes (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
(...) Leaving aside my own disagreement with (but understanding of) your assessment of "killing," I don't think the reissue of 398 is in lieu of the vote--this reissue must have been in the works for some time now. I'd expect we could see the (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
Ben: You're absolutely entitled to your own opinion on these matters, but you have to be in an extreme minority on this point. In a time when TLC has given up traditional building methods and so few modern sets actually contain traditional elements, (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
(...) WooHoo! That's gonna hurt my pocket again, but hey.. what a great set to be able to get! I hust hope that we haven't spoiled Brads or Jakes announcmentplans ... again :-) Mark -me first and the gimme-gimme's- de Kock (22 years ago, 16-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
(...) one that nobody expected to be a candidate - why the poll about 375 and others if 398 is the one to be 'killed'?). Kind Regards, Ben P.s.: I have said more than once, why I think legends to be so bad. I am not in the mood to start in such a (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
(...) I think it comes from a time when certain objects had to be 'represented' rather than being made from a brick that was made specifically for that object. Example in this set... the sails. The bricks are made to represent the sails, not to (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Turntables gezocht
|
|
Lang leve bricklink: (URL) Witkamp" <ron@witkamp.net> wrote in message news:GxsFqn.GMs@lugnet.com... (...) niet (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl)
|
| |
| | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
(...) That's what *all* LEGO models looked like in "the old days". Kids were encouraged to build great models with a much more limited array of bricks. (...) As Hop-frog said, it's a re-release of a classic old set. And I wouldn't hesitate to buy (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
(...) Nope. Try #398. Pretty old too. I'd buy it in a heartbeat if has those original squared yellow windows -- even if they are updated versions of the squared windows and not just the plain yellow headlight elements. Even if it's just the regular (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
