 | | Re: Re Brickshelf links (was Re: A standard docking port/shaft)
|
|
(...) the third time for what?--can't see the file? Jeff (22 years ago, 8-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Re Brickshelf links (was Re: A standard docking port/shaft)
|
|
(...) Jeff! dude! Its not your fault (exactly), and its not really Brickshelf's fault (exactly). I'd love to see your stuff, but "This file is not yet public" I guess I'm supposed to check back from time to time in the hope that at some stage it (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Re Brickshelf links (was Re: A standard docking port/shaft)
|
|
(...) Wouldn't deep linking to the images themselves solve this problem? I just tested this idea here: (URL) it seems to work fine. Just get the URLs to the actual images and paste them into your MOC anouncements. No waiting for approval necessary (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Re Brickshelf links (was Re: A standard docking port/shaft)
|
|
(...) oops i posted to the wrong newsgroup first! here it is, dudes! this is the general idea for the port--the actual width can be changed as wished. i wanted to display the arrangement of pegs & holes that work well (URL) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Re Brickshelf links (was Re: A standard docking port/shaft)
|
|
(...) P.S.: this would work for BOTH sides of the port -the ship & the station-- that's the beauty of it--one design that has male & female parts! (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
