Subject:
|
Re: BrikWars final organisations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 May 2002 20:39:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
472 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Shaun Sullivan writes:
> In lugnet.loc.au, Zac Soden writes:
> > Also on a side note I don't think that we should be playing with fire either
> > as it adds too much complexity...
>
>
> ... If a nosy Yank might interject a thought, I'd suggest *not* to shy away
> from fire. It certainly seems complicated at first, but it's actually pretty
> straightforward, and the benefit of having it in the game is nearly
> immeasurable. Witness:
>
> Poured cauldrons of burning oil:
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=53705
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=53706
>
> Flamethrowers/Plasma guns:
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=9303
>
> For instant visual effect and macabre fun, it's hard to top a good roaring
> blaze. It also acts as an easy-to-place barricade.
>
> Of course, if you include it now, *everybody* might try and use it, and that
> *would* become unbearably complicated very quickly. One good fire per game,
> that's what I always say ;)
>
> Have fun!
> -s
Hi Shaun, it's always good to have a noisy Yank interjecting thoughts
especially when they're had more experience in the field! You put up a very
good arguement. It does add so much more visual pleasure - maybe I'll bring
along a heap of little fire pieces on stands and we'll see what happens...
Thanks for the feedback,
Zac
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: BrikWars final organisations
|
| (...) ... If a nosy Yank might interject a thought, I'd suggest *not* to shy away from fire. It certainly seems complicated at first, but it's actually pretty straightforward, and the benefit of having it in the game is nearly immeasurable. Witness: (...) (22 years ago, 29-May-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
