Subject:
|
Re: Limbless monkeys
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 May 2000 13:55:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
713 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Richard Parsons writes:
> > > I've been using monkeys as a source of brown arms and yellow hands for quite
> > > a while now......is that wrong?
> > It depends -- have you got ethics committee approval?
>
> Uhh huh.
<snipped mouth watering commentary on scotch, shortbread, and the consequences>
> After all, we found that if you gave the limbs back at some point, the
> monkey was fine. We decided that in point of fact we were only *borrowing*
> monkey limbs, and since the monkeys themselves had not complained, there was
> no cause of action.
<more consequences>
> Still, it seems to me the judgement stands, no?
Despite the rhinos,
abso-<<expletive indicating passionate endorsement deleted>>-lutely.
Reminds me of the old joke with the punch-line, "What are you going to do for a
face when the monkey wants its arms back?" Or have I remembered it wrong?
--Dave
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Limbless monkeys
|
| Dave Low wrote in message ... (...) in (...) Uhh huh. My glass of single malt scotch whisky and I discussed the issue in detail with some most excellent extra buttery shortbread, and we decided (unanimously I might add) that these were probably not (...) (24 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
