To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.auOpen lugnet.loc.au in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / Australia / 744
    Re: Australian Roll Call —Peter Callaway
   (...) So, every time I sit down with my LEGO I'm having a Plastic Moment? Pete Callaway (keep 'em coming!) (24 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
   
        Re: Australian Roll Call —Santosh Bhat
   Right that does it, If LegOz ever writes a Guide book, We name it -"AS3600 Lego Structures" LEGO Bricks + Mega Bloks = Composite Structure? Here's one for you Peter, Peter C without enough grey plates = sub-critical Peter C with too many grey plates (...) (24 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
   
        Re: Australian Roll Call —David Drew
    "Santosh" <santosh@student.unsw.edu.au> wrote in message news:FuzvHu.B20@lugnet.com... (...) Actually, technic would be more along the lines of AS1170 (minus the moving parts of course) due to the beams and pin connectors. :) David Drew. (24 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
   
        Australian Standards for LEGO —Peter Callaway
   (...) Guys, guys. C'mon! Concrete? Loadings? I'd at least put it in as a suppliment to AS4100, since perhaps Parts 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 are directly applicable. Structural LEGO is more akin to steel than concrete, and the loading code is only used to (...) (24 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
   
        Re: Australian Standards for LEGO —Santosh Bhat
     (...) What say we at loc.au develop the first lego Structural code, we call it (Australian Lego Stadard) ALS2000. And Yes the first appendix can be Appendix L < Engineering Geek Discussion mode> Hmm See I'd have to disagree with the Lego being akin (...) (24 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
    
         Re: Australian Standards for LEGO —Peter Callaway
     (...) L (...) Depends on what you're building, doesn't it, and a member in compression or tension doesn't automatically dictate it's material component. Houses, sure (although the bricks are behaving more like bricks and not a homogenous concrete (...) (24 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
   
        Re: Australian Standards for LEGO —David Drew
    "Peter Callaway" <pcallaway@bmcl.com.au> wrote in message news:Fv098q.Lxp@lugnet.com... (...) moving (...) suppliment (...) Argh! I got 4100 and 1170 confused *starts self-flagelation with birch sticks* Bah, I've been studying too much mining (...) (24 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
   
        Re: Australian Standards for LEGO —Paul Baulch
    David Drew wrote in message ... (...) Ah, but you see I have actually been lucky enough to meet Peter's wife, and I have to say she is amazingly cool about the staggering proportion of the house that his Lego occupies. Man, those bonus marks would (...) (24 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR