Subject:
|
Re: New Pricing??
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Sep 2000 05:30:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
420 times
|
| |
|
|
> Most of them were cheaper than the equivalent Star Wars models.
Having mulled over this for a couple of days, it occurred to me that Star
Wars models may be inherently more expensive than Adventurers etc, because
Star Wars Lego will involve a license fee to George Lucas (or whoever) while
non-licensed themes won't.
If this is correct, then sets like Winnie The Pooh and Mickey Mouse should
be more expensive than similar non-licensed theme sets for the same age
group.
What other licensed themes are there? Would soccer be a licensed theme? If
so, that would blow a hole in my theory.
Kerry
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: New Pricing??
|
| (...) I don't recall Winnie the Pooh Duplo being more expensive than other simiar sized Duplo sets, in fact I think I was surprised that the largest set was quite a bit cheaper than I had expected. Am going from memory though, not at home to check. (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | Re: New Pricing??
|
| (...) one thing to think about is that when the star wars sets were released piece counts within them jumped dramatically compared to their space predecesors. an example of this is the snowspeeder set which retails for $20 U.S. and contains 212 (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | New Pricing??
|
| After my regular Friday night Lego sweep of Bris. City a couple of weeks ago, I discovered that the new Adventurers stuff was in Target. The big plane (I can't remember it's set number) was there and priced at $39. 'This is quite cheap' I thought (...) (24 years ago, 4-Sep-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
