Subject:
|
Re: .org.it ?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:50:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
533 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Deidre Rushton Brumby writes:
> In lugnet.loc.au, Benjamin Whytcross writes:
> > Well, are you interested in trading catalogues...I've got quite a few
> > duplicates if you're interested.
>
> I don't actually have _that_ many, more than enough for a thin A4
> binder, not enough for a thick A4 binder :) Certainly not anywhere
> near the number that I'm under the impression you have!
>
> I seem to recall you posted a list of gaps in your cat collection some
> time ago, an update wouldn't hurt would it! (one more post :))
Actually, sometime this weekend I might get around to posting the list,
although it will be in more than 1 post, as there's quite a few and I'd prefer
that they were in a seperate post for each type so as not to confuse anyone.
The only problem with this...All the non instructions papers are stored in 7-8
A4 binders [at least 2 of which are FULL large ones] and I've added to the
collection without updating the list :(
> >
> > [It wouldn't have been the official lego binder [1184 or something similar,
> > I think...I've got no reference info here] If it was, then it's definitely a
> > lego posting :) ]
>
> No, never come across that (not even aware of it), any more details?
If I get a chance this weekend [see above] I'll scan the section of catalogue
with a picture and information about it, and try and post it to lugnet's
server. <It was set 1130, not 1184...the memory's going>
> > Anyway, we don't need to be discussing lego here..After all, those schemeing
> > northeners [and no, I'm not talking about other ockers] are just talking
> > about beating us...Deidre, could you come up with a couple of names from
> > there who aren't discussing lego in at least one posting. If we can get
> > that, maybe we can get them stopped from posting there...After all, the
> > forum is for discussing lego, not movies and food and anything they can try
> > and use to beat everyone else. :)
>
> I don't "read" all the loc.it posts, just a random sample every now and then
> with the odd search for "au" etc on the group. I think for the most
> part their threads start off as genuine Lego talk and then meander off-topic,
> I'm not sure whether this is a cover-up technique or just a natural
> progression! There is a fair amount of guff in their group, but then the
> same could be said of us (me in particular of late :))
>
> I was really reaching for that OBLego Ref :)
>
> Deidre
> drb@tasmail.com
Benjamin Whytcross
bwhytcro@pacificaccess.com.au
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: .org.it ?
|
| (...) I don't actually have _that_ many, more than enough for a thin A4 binder, not enough for a thick A4 binder :) Certainly not anywhere near the number that I'm under the impression you have! I seem to recall you posted a list of gaps in your cat (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
