 | | Meta-discussion: comfy with clones here in lugnet.loc.au?
|
|
Given that there is lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands group, would people prefer it if those of us dabbling in the Dark Side kept our discussions out of lugnet.loc.au? Ditto for lugnet.org.au? NB. I'm asking out of a sense of Netiquette. I haven't had (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
 | | Re: The TRU 25% off Lego sale
|
|
(...) Well, it started as an exercise, but then it was just too much effort to unload the trolley again :-) So, yes, I did buy the sets in question. In all seriousness, I was sufficiently pleased with the quality of the aircraft carrier to be (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
 | | Re: Sticking it to Todd (was Re: Clones Database)
|
|
(...) It's not in the business plan. (...) It's also a matter of principle. (...) LUGNET would not be LUGNET. (...) --Todd (also baldly going :-) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.db.scans)
|
|
 | | Re: Sticking it to Todd (was Re: Clones Database)
|
|
(...) Dan & Jenn Boger do, yes -- and have done incredibly huge great things in the past few months for the data in the DB. Selçuk Göre and Joshua Delahunty also have access and have done huge great things too. --Todd (25 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.db.scans)
|
|
 | | Re: The TRU 25% off Lego sale
|
|
(...) Same at Chatswood TRU: dozens of people, many of them buying two or more sets. (...) Kerry, did you actually buy that much MB? I was hoping it was just an exercise... --DaveL (25 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|