 | | Re: To Todd - Could we get .org.au up soon
|
|
(...) Maybe we should ask if they want to be included... Well guys? James (who notes that 'guys' is used in a non gender specific way) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.nz)
|
|
 | | Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK?
|
|
(...) I wouldn't say that's so much so. At least not with me. True, I don't like technic, but I AM fascinated with machinery and technology. Just not in the lego context. And maybe I am alone about this... but I don't think so. (...) <snip> Yeah. My (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
 | | Re: To Todd - Could we get .org.au up soon
|
|
(...) At the risk of sounding like another "me too" post... <general nodding and thumbs up> This will serve a pretty good purpose, not the least being to educate people like myself in the advantages and importance of the Lugnet Structure(TM). Whilst (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
 | | Aus 2000.2 catalogue text
|
|
Text from 2000.2 catalogue [as promised previously] Front cover :- none Inside :- The hidden island Johnny Thunder and his friends have found Dinosaurs on a hidden island. They are now trying to study them and protect them from greedy poachers who (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.general)
|
|
 | | Re: bulk ordering is here!
|
|
(...) US). That is so bizarre, isn't it? It really makes me wonder if someone goofed at Lego Australia. Maybe they divided instead of multipled when converting to Aussie dollars? (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
 | | Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK?
|
|
Of course, the catalogue is age-ist as well as sex-ist. When did you last see a middle-aged person depicted as playing with Lego in the catalogue (as opposed to being shown smiling approvingly in the background as a child plays with Lego)? Actually, (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
 | | Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK?
|
|
(...) Same here with the garbage Pete.... Kev... : ) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
 | | RE: To Todd - Could we get .org.au up soon
|
|
I'd personally go with Aus/NZ, and not just Aus at the moment[1]. (It MUST exclude auctions open to bidders outside whatever area, otherwise we'll become like .market.) [1] [got to help out our 7'th state] <G,D&R> Benjamin Whytcross (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
 | | Re: To Todd - Could we get .org.au up soon
|
|
(...) say (...) only, (...) Absolutely ,though maybe our friends across the Tasman would like to be included since they are so close.(ie New Zealand) pete.w <aquanaut@optusnet.com.au> (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
 | | Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK?
|
|
(...) When I did 18 months of the Bachelor of Nursing course at UTS, people would always ask "why are you doing nursing" (not staff or students). My mother-in-law thinks it strange that I do all the cooking. We have bought my 2yo son a doll and his (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|