 | | We are ready. —Ben Roller
|
| | | Ok, so it's 2002. We're ready, so go ahead any time and let us download the software you mentioned here: (URL) get started working on our creations so that there's no lag time in orders when you announce the service. Even if you don't plan to start (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct) !!
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: We are ready. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Um, the quote is: "Within a year building instructions for LEGO sets developed since 1955 will be accessible online." I see no "every" in there. :-) Here's the link for you: www.brickshelf.com :-) :-) (but ya, I want my custom set design tool (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: We are ready. —Ben Roller
|
| | | | | | (...) I noticed that, but was being hopeful. :) Also I was ignoring the fact that they could just put up one set of instructions and say "hey, this one was developed since 1955." (...) So, is that what Lego meant? Does Brickshelf even have (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: We are ready. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) I dunno. Note the smileys... :-) Maybe it's the routing they will go in future. I do NOT want to speculate further as I don't want to jiggle Kevin's elbow more than I just did. (...) Funny, I was thinking of saying the same thing about YOUR (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: We are ready. —Rob Doucette
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I get that alot from developers... 4 Q too! (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: We are ready. —Cary Clark
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.lego.direct, Ben Roller writes: ... (...) ... I have one Samsonite-era set from the early 70's: (URL) includes a single sheet showing models that _can't_ build with this set. I was amused. (In the set's defense, the back of the box shows (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: We are ready. —Jeffrey M. Szklennik
|
| | | | | (...) i think Lego should give credit where credit is due & endorse Lcad as the soft ware & build off that (with Mlcad maybe), in honor of Mr. James Jessiman jeff szklennik (22 years ago, 20-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: We are ready. —Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | | | (...) I swear.. the day LD acknowledges and uses .dat as the official means of selling custom sets, I'll drive to NY and kiss Brad on the mouth. Unfortunately, er.. maybe fortunately? I'm expecting LD's very own bloated format inside a glitzy-slick (...) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: We are ready. —Jonathan Mizner
|
| | | | | I was beginning to think I had dreamed that post up....with no follow-ups from Lego concerning to status of the Build-Your-Own-MOC. It would indeed be a good idea for them to release the software ahead of time, though, so we all have plenty of time (...) (22 years ago, 20-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: We are ready. —Lawrence Wilkes
|
| | | | "Ben Roller" <lugnews@rollerfamily.net> wrote in message news:Gutr9H.MDD@lugnet.com... (...) download the (...) in (...) this (...) orders (...) Sorry, but I can't help thinking that this software would be a huge disappointment if they released it (...) (22 years ago, 20-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: We are ready. —John Barnes
|
| | | | | (...) Perhaps this means that a larger variety of parts are, in fact, available :) I wonder - a model of a monolith made entirely of 2x6 yellow bricks. You want bulk bricks - just draw a big picture of them. I could live with that ;) JB (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: We are ready. —John Henry Kruer
|
| | | | | | | (...) Yeah... Couldn't you theoreticly use that with the lego mosaic? Just take a picture of a grey wall or something like that and send it in... Coarse, you would get plates. As for this mythical software: Hmmmm... I wish we had more info then this (...) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: We are ready. —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | | | | | <<snip>> (...) It's been done (the Mosaic thingie) by Henry Lim on his Catwomen, he used no less then 35 mosaics! See the result here: (URL) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: We are ready. —Lawrence Wilkes
|
| | | | | | "John Barnes" <barnes@sensors.com> wrote in message news:GuwALr.AG5@lugnet.com... (...) today. (...) for (...) available :) I don't think so. 1. the software isn't available anyway - so who knows. 2. it must be much, much more difficult for Lego to (...) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: We are ready. —Lou Zucaro
|
| | | | Ultimately, many things will determine if the software is successful, depending on your point of view. Personally, my take on that was that you would have a wide range of parts to select from, and when you were done, your parts list would be (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: We are ready. —Lawrence Wilkes
|
| | | | "Lou Zucaro" <lou@pause.com> wrote in message news:GuyF04.EGt@lugnet.com... (...) you (...) done, (...) Just think of the economics of doing that though. I just can't see it. lawrence (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
