 | | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
|
(...) No, I think Richie and I guess you, are missing *my* point. I'm only trying to point out that LEGO uses LUGNET as it's internet information distribution point to the exclusion of its own website. Things are announced on LUGNET that do not get (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
|
"Allan Bedford" <apotomeREMOVE-THIS@...vista.net> wrote in message news:Go5y2L.5I5@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) trying (...) distribution (...) [ ... snipped ... ] This isn't completely true. The 2002 catalog scans were provided to FBTB (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
|
Allan Bedford wrote in message ... (...) reply (...) were (...) The surveys are still appearing in sets, I have had some within the last few months. Don't remember which set(s) they were in. Over the last 3 years I have sent in several and handed (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
|
(...) Tim may correct me (don't know if he reads this board, don't care enough to X-post it), but I'm pretty sure the catalog came out of a FBTB reader's Darth Maul or other new SW set, which was then mailed to Tim. The watermark is just Tim's usual (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: WHY SO LONG ON BULK BRICKS???? LEGO PLEASE READ!
|
|
(...) In reality, the 'watermark' was placed there at the request of LEGO. I typically only read .starwars, but I do run a search of 'fbtb' every now and then to see what's being said and saw this. (23 years ago, 27-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
