Subject:
|
Re: The Relationship - LEGO and its Fans (was: Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Sat, 17 Mar 2001 08:00:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
26 times
|
| |
|
|
I can say this - if Todd continues to make this a less and less friendly place to
be (and relegating AFOLs that happen to work for TLG to Second Class Citizenship IS
less friendly, not to mention asinine), if TLG does an endrun around LUGNET, I'll
use it and drop LUGNET in a split second if the TLG system is friendlier.
This is one more nail in the coffin pushing me back to RTL. I'd rather have NO
rules and wade through too many useless posts than have too many rules (like this
one, that would force me to bounce all over different groups to follow a thread
simply because posters in that thread are AFOLs and TLG AFOLs).
Todd, I know you may think you are making things better, but all I can see is that
you are seriously #$()*ing things up.
"Marc Nelson Jr." wrote:
> I have a bad feeling that what is going to happen real soon is that LEGO will
> say, "forget it" to even trying to communicate with the AFOL community through
> LUGNET. And who could blame them? Just as they were starting to really
> communicate with us (as in back-and-forth dialogue as opposed to one LEGO post
> followed by AFOL discussion), we pull the rug out from under them. When
> somebody refers to LEGO's presence on LUGNET as leaving a "slime trail", I can
> see how they might not feel welcome.
>
> So maybe LEGO will decide it needs to do an end around LUGNET to actually get
> to us. Is that what we want? LEGO to be excluded from this community and forced
> to talk to us via email lists or a bulletin board on lego.com (ugh, I don't
> even want to think about what that would be like)? I think it is in everybody's
> (LEGO's and ours) best interest to keep LEGO as an active and valued member of
> the LUGNET community. But, given the current trend towards shutting LEGO
> empolyees out of 99% of LUGNET, it looks like that might be coming to an end.
>
> -Marc
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
232 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
