To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.lego.directOpen lugnet.lego.direct in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / LEGO Direct / 2252
2251  |  2253
Subject: 
Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp
Date: 
Sat, 17 Mar 2001 12:50:15 GMT
Viewed: 
2305 times
  
In lugnet.lego.direct, Mark Papenfuss writes:
In lugnet.lego.direct, Mike Faunce writes:
Todd, if you read this:  Good job!  I understand your motives perfectly and
applaud you for taking them.  It had to be a difficult decision and one that
you've probably thought about since LEGO Direct showed up here.

Mike
OK, so this makes what - 3 people that *understand* this? Compared to the
vast majority that do not *applaud* this action, hmmm.

I would not go assuming that.  Just because the "vocal majority" does not like
this right now does not mean that only 3 people agree with Todd.  Remember one
of the dynamics of Newsgroups is that people that disagree with a situation are
much more likely to post than people that agree.

That doesn't mean more people argree with Todd then don't but you can't assume
more people disagree with Todd just by the posts you read here.


(Note that I'm using my personal address)
So that makes this an un-official post and should we disregard it? You have
*no* official capicity here in any way, shape, or form, so that was just a
wast of time, bandwith and whatever you claimed Lego wasted here :)

Mark P.
Mfuss903@aol.com
Mfuss903@bigfoot.com
Mfuss903@yahoo.com
Mfuss903@bigfoot.com
Mfuss903@budweiser.com

Eric J.,
Take your pic, they all work. I am still waiting for an apology from you sir.

Mark,

I would suggest droping it and not goad people on.  There have been nasty
things said on both sides of this and it is better to ignore them then to stir
the pot more.  Believe me I know from experiance.  Be constructive and we will
all be better off.



Eric Kingsley



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
 
(...) True. We don't know the actual number of agree/disagree/undecided. Probably never will. My gut tells me more disagree, though, at least for now. Yours may differ. (people tend to think others agree with them) But irrelevant, ultimately. It's (...) (23 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
 
(...) OK, so this makes what - 3 people that *understand* this? Compared to the vast majority that do not *applaud* this action, hmmm. (...) So that makes this an un-official post and should we disregard it? You have *no* official capicity here in (...) (23 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp)

232 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR