To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.lego.directOpen lugnet.lego.direct in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / LEGO Direct / 2227
2226  |  2228
Subject: 
Re: The Relationship - LEGO and its Fans (was: Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.lego.direct
Date: 
Fri, 16 Mar 2001 16:42:11 GMT
Viewed: 
26 times
  
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Larry Pieniazek writes:

I never thought I'd see the day when the Powers that Be are insinuating that
LEGO folk lie to them(1), telling LEGO folks to shut up except in a narrow
little box because we're not interested in their information, and making it
hard for them to be AFOLs due to an "unfortunate side effect" that probably
never will be fixed because it's not high enough priority.

Well I may be mistaken but I think that Todd and Suz may feel a bit betrayed
by LD.  The one example that comes to mind is the T-Shirt Thread.

http://news.lugnet.com/announce/?n=863

Which a few months later got to this response from LD:

http://news.lugnet.com/lego/direct/?n=2012

Which I think Got Suzanne upset:

http://news.lugnet.com/lego/direct/?n=2025

And you know what I don't blame her.  All I know about this is what has been
posted on LUGNET but it seems like some promises were made and then retracted
which could be interpreted as a "lie".

I am not saying that this had anything to do with the decision to restrict TLC
posting to the .lego.* groups, but it is an indication that things are not
totally rosey between Todd, Suz, and LD.  Again I could be wrong but I just
thought I would point that out.



As for the rest of the discussion I think there are some that think TLC has
been banned from LUGNET when that isn't the case at all.  I actually think the
new restrictions will give LD a higher profile here because we all know exactly
where to look to find offical TLC posts, I think .lego.announce may become one
of my favorite places to look because I know whatever is posted there is
"official LEGO information".  Again I support the idea, even though the "vocal
majority" seems to be against it.



Eric Kingsley


1 - http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=28454



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Relationship - LEGO and its Fans (was: Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
 
(...) That explicit statement may have been Mark's straw man rather than a real statement, but I got that implication from things that have been said here. (...) One man's trash is another man's treasure. I didn't see all of those posts as clutter. (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.lego.direct)

232 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR