Subject:
|
Re: The Relationship - LEGO and its Fans (was: Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Mar 2001 02:47:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2721 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Eric Joslin writes:
> No one said that they cluttered up threads.
That explicit statement may have been Mark's straw man rather than a real
statement, but I got that implication from things that have been said here.
> They do have the ability to clutter up newsgroups, however:
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=11596
>
> 221 posts to lugnet.general and lugnet.dear-lego. I'd rather not have to wade
> through these kinds of posts to see MOCs, etc.
One man's trash is another man's treasure. I didn't see all of those posts
as clutter. Your opinion clearly is different than mine. Todd's counts here,
though. Fortunately for you, you have his ear.
I never thought I'd see the day when the Powers that Be are insinuating that
LEGO folk lie to them(1), telling LEGO folks to shut up except in a narrow
little box because we're not interested in their information, and making it
hard for them to be AFOLs due to an "unfortunate side effect" that probably
never will be fixed because it's not high enough priority.
Hopefully I haven't seen that day and I'm misinterpreting things. But I
wonder what's really going on here.
1 - http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=28454
++Lar
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
232 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
