Subject:
|
Re: LEGOs dirty trick: making money by not producing all masks as announced.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 02:30:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
606 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Todd Lehman writes:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:05:49 GMT, Brian Kasprzyk writes:
> > I agree with this statement! I posted about this almost a year ago about
> > how the quality of the Lego brick is way down. Anyone that has old Lego can
> > put it sid by side with the new ones and can see that there are huge
> > differences in the quality. Here are a few:
>
> When you say "old Lego," roughly what year or year range are you referring
> to? I haven't really noticed any quality differences recently, but huge
> quality differences since the 70's (better since then). Is the quality
> lesser now than, say, 5 years ago? I seem to remember people noticing in
> 1995 that new bricks didn't hold as tightly as new bricks from 1990 did
> then.
>
> --Todd
>
> [note to LD: Is this kind of discussion helpful in a lugnet.lego.direct
> context or would it be more helpful to you in a different group such as
> lugnet.general?]
I have noticed the 'fingerprint' thing too, but I thought it was because the
bricks were shinier or more vivid. I haven't noticed any increase in
scratching. Though I have noticed that some of the printing is substandard.
Though I have not seen any sign of this in the Star Wars sets, but have
noticed it in other 'newer' themes.
Gabe Bark
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
