| |
In lugnet.market.shopping, Richard Marchetti writes:
> Bring back some old elements in bulk offerings and you can scoop up losses
> from the secondary market, and people can then buy more lego with monies
> budgeted for Lego that they didn't thusly have to spend (waste?) on the
> secondary market. I am sure someone will post that its just not worth it
> for TLC to bother with this strategy, but I think they are wrong (in advance!).
They shouldn't think of it as "bothering" at all! 8^0 In previous
threads people have said that, even if TLC should go belly-up, they would
satisfy their Lego needs on the secondary market rather than buying clone
brands. That's a heavy observation--if people would rather spend a lot more
on the 2ndary market than buy from the competition, how much more willing
would they be to buy primary market LEGO direct from the source?!
I know that there may be logistical problems surrounding the production of
out-of-print sets, but there is an undeniable market for such sets, probably
every bit as strong as the Lego Sculpture market, and TLC has already taken
care of its overhead and design costs on vintage sets!
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
