|
|
 | | Re: You get to choose!
|
| (...) Which one? Howie, AJ or Brian? ;) g,d,r (FUT .pun) -- Erin (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: Legends in stores?
|
| Ha, think you have problems? Try living in Canada and see the money we have to pay for S@H....at least you have Shop@Home as an affordable option... Oh well, when life gives you lemons, chuck 'em at somebody else and laugh ;) -- Erin (...) (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Desiring Machine (was Re: You get to choose!)
|
| (...) Amen! I have to agree. And I, for one, have grown up with UFO, town JR, and Insectoids, and believe me, I ain't happy with it! :-) Lego Legends are supposed to be that: legends. I think that if you don't count a set as a legend just because (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: Why not a cypress tree in the Legends re-release of 6390?
|
| "William R Ward" <bill@wards.net> wrote in message news:m21ydke6y4.fsf@...rds.net... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) [ ... snipped ... ] The old style rails are currently in production for the HP Gringott's Bank set. However, looking at the 6390 (...) (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: Why not a cypress tree in the Legends re-release of 6390?
|
| (...) I'm wondering just what new baseplates it will come with. Hopefully not the green ones! I would've thought that it would've said they if they were a different color. As for the tree, probably 100% of the cypress trees that were made are (...) (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: $2,137.00
|
| (...) [...] (...) It tends to drive up the final price, in my opinion. I think it's better to wait until the last minute (or in some cases, the last 10 seconds) of an auction before submitting your true highest bid... --Bill. XFUT: (...) (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | Re: You get to choose!
|
| (...) At least they did re-release 8459 (as 8464). Though not a "legends" release, it certainly made me happy 8?) ROSCO (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: $2,137.00
|
| (...) ferroequus was never a high bidder. Here's the play by play: 1. dansoere (0) bid $60.00 on Apr-02-02 12:02:56 <-- High Bidder 2. robertjay2002 (0) bid $51.00 on Apr-02-02 12:18:29 3. robertjay2002 (0) bid $55.00 on Apr-02-02 12:19:06 4. (...) (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: $2,137.00
|
| (...) Frank explained the mechanics, as for the motivation I speculate he was trying to outbid the current high bidder but by just a little. That's a sign of indecisiveness, inexperience, or possibly bid shielding. Hope that helps. FUT market.theory (...) (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | Re: Why not a cypress tree in the Legends re-release of 6390?
|
| (...) My guess: because of all the complains about the "bent" cypresses? ;-) (...) This one I sort of disagree: if they are to use the method from 6542, it may prove to be more functional. OTOH, I could use the older system just as good as a source (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: You get to choose!
|
| (...) Definitely exists (I have two 664 TV Camera sets bought for the black hat). There is at least one other stiffy set with a black cowboy hat (372 Texas Rangers, which also has red ones). I agree about the question on the tree on 6390, WHY??? (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Why not a cypress tree in the Legends re-release of 6390?
|
| Why? I can understand the new baseplates, but why replace the tree when you just came out with them in a service pack? Also, why replace the slider with specialized parts? Frank (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: $2,137.00
|
| (...) Got it! (...) That would really be useful. I mean, just to satisfy my curiosity... :-^ (...) Most convenient, the whole system. Does it work as intended, never creating any sort of issues? Thanks, Frank! Pedro (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: $2,137.00
|
| (...) If you look carefully, you will see that the higher bids are older, and thus were "proxy" bids (where you bid what you really think you want to pay for the item, then the system submits the lowest possible bid for you, and then automatically (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: $2,137.00
|
| (...) Oh... I see. So this is done automatically. It's a bit of a shame that the "competing" bidders in such bids are not displayed - I'd sure love to know the details of this "fight"... ;-) Thanks, John! Pedro (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: $2,137.00
|
| (...) Maybe somebody bidded higher and so Ebay raised his bid until the bid went over his Maximum Bid? John Kruer (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: You get to choose!
|
| (...) While there are some controls to reduce the chances and effect of ballot stuffing, there is no sure way to prevent it (without requiring a login like LEGO does on their poll). KL (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: $2,137.00
|
| (...) Actually, I'm sort of confused as to what exactly that "iron horse" (ferroequus, whatever...) dude was doing - why did he successively outbid himself? Pedro (who knows virtually nothing about the fantastic world of auctions) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: $2,137.00
|
| (...) Yeah, I don't care for it, and I was trying to vaguely insult those that do. (...) It's good of you to give me the benefit of the doubt, but alas... -- Hop-Frog (the unworthy) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: You get to choose!
|
| (...) Kevin, is there any way to make sure that people don't vote for a set more than once? I wouldn't want to see somebody rigging the polls. :o) Rob robo2705@hotmail.com (22 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
