To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.lego.directOpen lugnet.lego.direct in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / LEGO Direct / 4385
4384  |  4386
Subject: 
Re: Why not a cypress tree in the Legends re-release of 6390?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego.direct
Date: 
Fri, 12 Apr 2002 23:35:16 GMT
Viewed: 
584 times
  
In lugnet.lego.direct, Frank Filz writes:
Why?

I can understand the new baseplates, but why replace the tree when you
just came out with them in a service pack?

My guess: because of all the complains about the "bent" cypresses?  ;-)

Also, why replace the slider
with specialized parts?

This one I sort of disagree: if they are to use the method from 6542, it may
prove to be more functional. OTOH, I could use the older system just as good
as a source of parts...


Pedro (wishing this is the chosen set, for it is the sole one of the 5 never
sold in .pt  :-)



Message is in Reply To:
  Why not a cypress tree in the Legends re-release of 6390?
 
Why? I can understand the new baseplates, but why replace the tree when you just came out with them in a service pack? Also, why replace the slider with specialized parts? Frank (23 years ago, 12-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

7 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR