 | | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
|
(...) That kind of information would be covered under the NDA so I can't specifically comment. (...) After, last nite back at the hotel, and most all day during the meeting. Train MOCs have a way of taking up the entire table, which is not prudent. (...) (24 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Use of lugnet.lego.direct and lugnet.dear-lego
|
|
I'd like to make a suggestion on the use of lugnet.lego.direct and lugnet.dear-lego. Of late there has been much "debate" about whether TLC is doing "the right thing" or not, or somewhere in between. While some very legitimate concerns are getting (...) (24 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
|
(...) Awesome! I hope all of those who have been whining will think about what happened here, and think about Larry's comments over the past few months about how whining is not the best way to go about things, and consider that this meeting probably (...) (24 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
|
(...) My apologies everyone, I totally underestimated the power of the (LEGO)Force. I'm very glad that Trains have a bright future, this has been my lesson in faith. -Harvey (...) (24 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: More Venom Anyone? ( Was Re: Give them a break (was:Hey, like, is anyone there? ))
|
|
You know, I've stayed out of this debate for a long time now, though, I can't stand this anymore.. Granted, I've bought some (all) Throwbots, they were interesting when they first came out... a couple Roboriders, (got as b-day presents). Though I'm (...) (24 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
|
(...) Exxx...xxxcellent. (...) So you know then? (...) MOCs at din? --Todd (24 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) Yes I can decisively say that. I think I did already, actually. (...) That kind of information would be covered under the NDA so I can't specifically comment. (...) After dinner the lot of us fested till pretty late, so at 2 AM when (...) (24 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) I am happy to hear trains will be around. I would like to know why the female part of this group was left out. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.:((((( Rose (24 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
|
(...) Awesome! (...) Ohohoo, when you say "the future of the product line," I assume you are referring to trains? If so, that sounds very encouraging! Can you say whether rumors of the train product line's demise are greatly exaggerated? Will be any (...) (24 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: lego software
|
|
"eric shumacher" <reckling@concentric.net> wrote in message news:G875Kn.1Ew@lugnet.com... (...) Is this some sort of elaborate prank? I apologize for my skepticism but I don't recognize your name in connection with LEGO, and I haven't found it (...) (24 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> Forgot to crosspost to .direct ++Lar (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Ok I have a question about the CD's
|
|
Rose, Thanks for the attention! I have emailed some people to find out the answer to this. I will let you know as soon as I get a solid answer. Thanks! jake (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Ok I have a question about the CD's
|
|
I have posted a about Ebay sellers selling cd's with the Lego instructions. Does Lego really care? Ebay will not do anything about them. Is there a "watchdog" that we should email when we find something like this? Rose (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | "Lego's online dream" -- feature article in UK Guardian Unlimited newspaper
|
|
(...) Chloe's article appeared Thursday. Here's a link to the online version: (URL) in the article: Douglas Coupland, Microserfs, Microsoft, Xbox, Harry Potter, LEGOLAND theme parks, Danielle Hainauer, Star Wars, Steven Spielberg, INmotion, Johnson (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.general, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.announce) !!
|
| |
| | Re: More Venom Anyone? ( Was Re: Give them a break (was:Hey, like, is anyone there? ))
|
|
(...) I think that's a really important point! Hard to say how much money the Bioknuckles would make compared to bulk element sales if they'd actually gotten that going by now, but it seems like TLC is taking the seductive and risky marketing road (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: More Venom Anyone? ( Was Re: Give them a break (was:Hey, like, is anyone there? ))
|
|
(...) Wow. Have I been whinning in my posts here? I hope not. I actually thought I had something constructive to say...now I'm beginning to think twice. I will however, admit that I've been rude, certainly less than nice. I will not, however (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Let's be realistc (WasRe:MoreVenomAnyone? (WasRe:Givethemabreak (was:Hey,like,isanyonethere?)))
|
|
(...) I have wondered about this also. (...) So you worry about negative posts here damaging a good relationship with TLC? Please don't. The LEGO Company does have to listen due to the fact that their bulk sales will get a real shot in the arm from (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: More Venom Anyone? ( Was Re: Give them a break (was:Hey, like, is anyone there? ))
|
|
(...) Yeah, actually. I think you might find it called "We actually want to have a good relationship with a major company that really doesn't HAVE to listen to us or give input, but does anyway, albeit in a slow and strange manner." (...) Yes. You (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Direct Sales Venom
|
|
I probably shouldn’t be answering a troll post, but I post infrequency enough anyway. I find it hard to believe I’m siding with Larry again. Having worked for Lego in what seems like a long ago life, I can understand your frustrations about the time (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
