To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 27366
27365  |  27367
Subject: 
Re: More Venom Anyone? ( Was Re: Give them a break (was:Hey, like, is anyone there? ))
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct
Date: 
Sun, 4 Feb 2001 03:42:28 GMT
Viewed: 
2926 times
  
You know, I've stayed out of this debate for a long time now, though, I can't
stand this anymore.. Granted, I've bought some (all) Throwbots, they were
interesting when they first came out... a couple Roboriders, (got as b-day
presents). Though I'm really upset about the lack of bricks/beams in these kinds
of sets anymore.  The Brick is what made this company.  why are they straying so
far from it lately? I understand the need to create new parts, though WHERE ARE
THE BEAMS?  (remember those long things with studs on the top...)  Now because
of bulk ordering I can't even order beam packs from S@H anymore, and they aren't
offered from bulk ordering.  I think we shot ourselves in the foot there :(  I
don't think they should have taken the items out of the catalog before they were
able to offer them in bulk.  and I don't call the silver champion a bulk pack,
though it seems those $100.00+ sets are the only things to get beams anymore.

Just my half a penny.. because I need to stop now before I get myself in a nasty
mood and probably say some nasty stuff :(

Tamy


Todd Lehman wrote:

> In lugnet.lego.direct, Richard Marchetti writes:
> > [...]  So they can blow the big money on Bionickle junk, but not on the
> > bulk orders program eh?  That's good business, eh?  Right.  [...]
> 
> I think that's a really important point!  Hard to say how much money the
> Bioknuckles would make compared to bulk element sales if they'd actually
> gotten that going by now, but it seems like TLC is taking the seductive
> and risky marketing road that promises to makes the brand more famous
> (or, hmm, maybe it will serve to tarnish it? -- time will tell) rather
> than the conservative road that would definitely put money in the bank.
> I guess TLC likes to learn the hard way.  Of course, no matter how well
> or poorly Bioknuckles do, they'll probably insist on calling it a success
> given how much marketing exposure it will have had by this time next year.
> 
> --Todd
> 
> p.s.  I actually think the Bionicle sets look kinda cool -- and I plan to
> collect them all as I did with the Slizer and RoboRiders sets! (I'm a sucker
> for colors and weird parts) -- but I totally agree TLC should have put its
> money into something safer instead.



1 Message in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR