To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.legoOpen lugnet.lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / 2730
2729  |  2731
Subject: 
Re: to LEGO factory : You are not being fair.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego
Date: 
Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:31:20 GMT
Viewed: 
3869 times
  
In lugnet.lego, Sean Kenney wrote:

   I couldn’t find any contact info on the LEGO factory web site, so I am posting this message here.

Ditto!

I inadverdently uploaded an entry that exceeds the 16x16 limitation, but there is no mechanism for me to retract the entry, nor is there a mechanism to make sure it is disqualified.

Yes, it’s actually important to make sure it’s disqualified so (a) people don’t waste votes and so (b) people have fewer entries to evaluate before casting their votes.

--Muze



Message has 1 Reply:
  Ack! [Was: Re: to LEGO factory : You are not being fair.]
 
(...) OK, OK, I just noticed that there is, and I have done so. Geez, I'm doing well today! [ stifles a growl ] --Muze (20 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.lego)

Message is in Reply To:
  to LEGO factory : You are not being fair.
 
Dear LEGO Factory... I couldn't find any contact info on the LEGO factory web site, so I am posting this message here. Week 1's winner? You have pronounced the "Senior winner" of the contest's first week, yet this person has clearly cheated, as well (...) (20 years ago, 22-Nov-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX) !! 

13 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR