| | Re: Pokemon blitzes Lego
|
| (...) I hate to post me too posts, but ... Blaming losses on Pokemon may be a good cover for the news and for Joe Public, but if people inside the company *really* think that Pokemon is at fault for their sales drop, they need to get sacked. Lego (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | Re: Pokemon blitzes Lego
|
| (...) managed (...) have (...) I agree with both of you that Pokemon is probably not the only reason for their losses. But just for your information, Pokemon has been launched in Europe in 2000 and not in 1999. There's a pretty standard calendar for (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | Re: Pokemon blitzes Lego
|
| (...) I wonder if they would have blamed Furby last year. It may bear seeing how Ritvik's been doing with the Pokemon licence-- I haven't seen that much of the theme stuff out, though, so it's either been going fast or not been produced in all (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | Re: Pokemon blitzes Lego
|
| (...) D'oh! Of course. I didn't think about the time lapse for things making their way to Europe. (...) Ah! LEGO sets aside, the first two Harry Potter novels were released in the UK before even the first one was released in the USA. It was not (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | Re: Pokemon blitzes Lego
|
| (...) the (...) their (...) the UK (...) Sure. They were released in the UK because Mrs. Rowling is from the UK. But the things will go different for the movie and the licensed merchandising. (...) My (...) huge (...) interested to (...) In Europe (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego)
| |