 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) <snip> (...) Really, thanks guys. I appreciate the support. This is the LEGO User Group NETwork, and this is why I'm here. Beyond that, for the 3+ (almost 4) decades of fun that TLC has provided by their product I had to say something. Here's (...) (22 years ago, 23-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| Yes, I'm sure AFOLs are more aware of sales and hot deals and pay less per brick than a casual LEGO shopper (exception: those who just pick up 4496's at Wal-Mart; $14.88 for 1000 bricks is hard to beat). On the other hand, AFOLs but orders of (...) (22 years ago, 23-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) Well if it still sells very well I hope it is produced in dark blue as well. Only because I think a set this well designed deserves a large production run and a spot in the S@H cataloge, and thus further increase its sales. I am just glad to (...) (22 years ago, 23-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <larry.(mylastname)@...e.DOT.com> wrote in message news:I96Ln0.1GsL@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) there (...) hardly (...) I too agree with Dave Schuler and Larry. I really applaud Dave Koudys for continuing to be (...) (22 years ago, 23-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) The above is not just the DMAS (Dave Mutual Admiration Society) speaking, there are a lot of other people on LUGNET that feel the very same way, myself included. (...) I totally agree with this, well said, Dave! (22 years ago, 23-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
