 | | Re: Lego Island
|
| (...) in (...) Hey, I remember that game! I only played it once, though. The most fun part of the whole game was going up into that big tower and clicking the cabinet so that the monkey would come running out. As for the minifig idea, I personally (...) (26 years ago, 4-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: Custom Kits & Communications
|
| (...) Amen to that. After all, we are talking about a child's toy. TLC *should* stick to marketing to the youth of the world (God knows we need kids playing with LEGO a lot more than Ninetendo, watching MTV, etc) while providing bulk services for (...) (26 years ago, 4-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Lego.com Builder's Gallery Down
|
| I just wanted to point out that the Builder's Gallery at lego.com is down. When you click the "vote for model" button, none of the pictures on the new page load. Also, if anyone from TLC is reading this, I think you should check out this line of (...) (26 years ago, 5-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: Lego Island
|
| My wife just found this game in a bargain bin at Best Buy in Nashville for $4.99!!! I think it is a great LEGO attempt at a simple adventure game... I want a RPG that includes the TOWN, or any other theme... That would be cool.... Gene (26 years ago, 5-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: Lego Island
|
| (...) My favorite part is running people over -- they fly apart and then go back together again. Just like real life. I also like the ambulance scene in the intro. (26 years ago, 5-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) LEGO has respectfully requested that the leaked information on this thread be deleted or otherwise removed from view. Since this was a formal request and TLC's privacy rights are in question here, this is a legal issue and I will be deleting (...) (26 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.announce)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| Oh OK. Sorry LEGO (...) Jorge Rodríguez rodriguez.136@osu.edu (26 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| Well, at least that proves it wasn't a hoax... (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | Please do not associate my personal views with my employer (26 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Ahh, hmm. So, the information has been released to Target Stores, and Target has placed it in their computer. An employee of Target who has access to that information legally (ie, he was not sneaking into his bosses' offices) shared it with (...) (26 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct) !
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Gotta agree with Eric here. And wow, I guess I either need to spend more time reading various groups again or give up entirely. In fact, I'm a little scared after looking at the little dots view of this thread. Most of what I'm seeing are (...) (26 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Well said. ~Nick (URL) (26 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Oh, and P.S.: Todd only deleted a lot of the reply messages because the original message was in with the reply, which makes a lot of sense. Most of the replies were mostly "Wow, that's cool" so, personally, I feel Todd did exercise good (...) (26 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Yes, I deleted as few messages as possible -- only the ones which contained references to the materials which were asked to be deleted. --Todd (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) What if someone goes in to Target, asks an employee for that info, gets it, and then posts it here? (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Well, you know, the same exact thing would have happened if LEGO had asked the same thing a year ago. The only difference now is that they're paying attention, so they notice things like this. And they use e-mail, which makes things go faster. (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) I don't really have a problem with your reasons for canceling the various posts that began this thread. My problem is that TLC seems to be asking you to replace their clothing when *they* are the ones walking about nude! If they have a problem (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Interesting question. The info is out there. It WILL be discussed. I've received numerous copies of it already. I could simply post it on my website or to RTL or any number of places (either taking credit for it or as anonymously as possible) (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Me too. But in this case, *Target* is the source of the leak. At this point, it's fair game. The only issue that comes into it for me is the one of respect for Lego. Out of respect for them, I personally will avoid posting data that I might (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Apple's quiet crackdown began more than two years ago. Heads rolled, because they leaked bogus information that was planted to detect the leak. Apple may have gotten "better publicity" for last month's crackdown on photos of "the cube", but it (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| However, In reality LEGO was only doing their usual pre-sale marketing prep... ie: updating retail store databases in preparation for the upcoming December release... This however should be a problem directed at Target abd its handling of said (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
