To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.invOpen lugnet.inv in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Inventories / 340 (-10)
  Re: peeron inventory
 
(...) You are correct, I got fooled by what was in the inventory, so these should be changed to 4 of each x425 and x797 with the little train and tender molded on the back. Thank you. I had the right ones in the set and did not notice. John P (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.inv)
 
  Re: peeron inventory
 
(...) ---snip--- (...) ---snip--- x425 wheels are unsuitable for rail vehicles. They have flanges on both sides which makes them run badly at points or crossings. I don't have this set but I think that there are probably none of x425 but 4 of x556 (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.inv)
 
  Re: peeron inventory
 
(...) I realize that. The parts that were not in the motor set were parts that were extra in the 8851. What Lego did was include the parts to put the motor in except for the parts that were in the motor set itself. If you build the model without the (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.inv)
 
  Re: peeron inventory
 
(...) You can't count that. You have to figure based on what's in the set, not what Lego suggests you add to the set. There are many Technic sets that have instructions for models made with parts from two or more sets. Tim (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.inv)
 
  peeron inventory
 
8851: This was a hard one in that adding the motor 8700 was in the instructions. Extra parts are needed, some in the motor and some in the 8851 set. What I came up with (my set was purchased by me and opened by me) was: 3707 black technic axle 8 (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.inv)
 
  Re: peeron inventory
 
(...) Then please, leave out the commentary. You come across as being condescending, insulting, and rude. If you have corrections that you want to post to Lugnet, well, fine I guess. But if your intent is to start a flame war so that it draws (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.inv, lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: peeron inventory
 
(...) Thanks Dan. I don't believe that I made accusations about anything. I just said that it is taking a long time to make the corrections. I realize that there are volunteers and I would be willing to volunteer. I do not think that it takes more (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.inv)
 
  Re: peeron inventory
 
(...) John - I certainly agree that you shouldn't assume an inventory made from instructions (or pictures for that matter) is 100% correct. That's exactly the reason why we specify the source of the inventory in the first place! As for updates, once (...) (18 years ago, 2-Apr-07, to lugnet.inv)  
 
  Re: peeron inventory
 
(...) Sorry, did not know that it was that big of an event. I'll have to go next year. I am sure that there are people that would like to throw things at me. John P (18 years ago, 2-Apr-07, to lugnet.inv)
 
  Re: peeron inventory
 
(...) A lot of people might be at or now just getting in/recovering from Brickfest in Portland. Best, Jonathan (18 years ago, 2-Apr-07, to lugnet.inv)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR