 | | Re: peeron inventory —Dan Boger
|
| | | (...) John - I certainly agree that you shouldn't assume an inventory made from instructions (or pictures for that matter) is 100% correct. That's exactly the reason why we specify the source of the inventory in the first place! As for updates, once (...) (18 years ago, 2-Apr-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: peeron inventory —John Patterson
|
| | | | (...) Thanks Dan. I don't believe that I made accusations about anything. I just said that it is taking a long time to make the corrections. I realize that there are volunteers and I would be willing to volunteer. I do not think that it takes more (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: peeron inventory —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Then please, leave out the commentary. You come across as being condescending, insulting, and rude. If you have corrections that you want to post to Lugnet, well, fine I guess. But if your intent is to start a flame war so that it draws (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.inv, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: peeron inventory —John Patterson
|
| | | | (...) Thanks Dave: Thanks Dave: I treat others well. If anything is rude it is the people that take apart every comment I make, which I really do not give a hoot about. The inventories are messed up; I am trying to fix that. Almost every one I look (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: peeron inventory —Wayne McCaul
|
| | | | | (...) For a guy who's thick-skinned, you sure when to a lot of trouble to prove it. (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: peeron inventory —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Patterson wrote: --snip-- (...) John, You're really beginning to make me very irritated. You seem unable to accept responsibility for the way you put things and seem to justify this in a variety of ways including (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: peeron inventory —John Patterson
|
| | | | | | (...) Tim: I was not rude to volunteers, I even offered to volunteer to get thing done. I want to help and have only come here when Dan ignored my requests as to what was happening to the corrections sent into Peeron.com. I am still not sure what (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: peeron inventory —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | | | (...) --snip-- (...) John, It was not polite to make the comment "Corrections sent to inv@peeron again are not getting posted. It has been a bit since they did a few.". The reason it isn't polite is because it is a) unneccesary and b) expectant as (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: peeron inventory —John Patterson
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I differ with you here. Serious collectors need to know. You have no idea how many are wrong. This is not impolite. It is a systemic problem. Would you feel that it is more polite just to note it on Lugnet? If that is a solution I can do it. I (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: peeron inventory —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | | | | --snip-- (...) Hi John, Thanks for taking that on board. Noone is saying your contribution isn't worthwhile and I don't think anyone minds your regular updates of what you've done. If you stick to these I think we will all be happier. It also means (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: peeron inventory —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | (...) Actually, although it was impolite to call me "Mad Dave", I was very amused at the title. Perhaps you've confused the myriad of Dave's involved, or perhaps you have this vision of me where I'm shouting at the top of my lungs or something. (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: peeron inventory —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | (...) Yep--I'm the Mad Dave around here! Worked long and hard for that title and I'm not willing to give it up to any old Dave! Dave K (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: peeron inventory —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Yes you do. - "If anyone is spring loaded to the piss off position it is you." - "Valium might be in the future for you, or high blood pressure. You really need to calm down." - "remember 7 comes after 6 and before 8, perhaps that will help." (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: peeron inventory —John Patterson
|
| | | | (...) If it was not you who sent the picture, I am sorry. I do agree Now that I have said some things that I should not have. Those are the examples you quoted above. I was fustrated at months of waiting for changes to appear and Dan didn't answer (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
