 | | Re: LEGO for Life Sweepstakes —David Eaton
|
| | | (...) I know a few... mostly, I'd say people fall in the "under 10" category or "way over 10" category. My younger brother and sister's collection (they don't care for it nearly as much as I) is about 4 or 5 sets... Also, our neighbors family has a (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO for Life Sweepstakes —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | (...) <snip> I guess this begs the question however. Would these people be going to the LEGO web site and filling out the form? If they are not that "into" LEGO I would guess not. I am sure that there are plenty of folks out there that don't have (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO for Life Sweepstakes —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | | (...) Yep. That's exactly why I said I'd expect to see numbers VASTLY in the 10+ range, and maybe only a couple token entries in the less than 10 categories. Hence, despite the fact that the 'majority' of households have less than 10, the data will (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO for Life Sweepstakes —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) That was my initial reaction, but it depends on how much this sweepstakes is promoted. Offer someone the chance to win $2,000 worth of a pricey line of toys, and they are *much* more likely to give you some marketing info, regardless of their (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO for Life Sweepstakes —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) inside (...) True. I was just thinking that with Primo/Duplo, then Lego, it's really easy for a family to climb past 10 sets, especially when you consider the dozen or so sets under $5.00. Also, it strikes me that the people who aren't into (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
