Subject:
|
Re: When should the 2000 Catalogue Appear?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Followup-To:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sat, 2 Oct 1999 03:07:59 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@%stopspammers%mattdm.org
|
Viewed:
|
749 times
|
| |
|
|
Matthew Miller <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote:
> If we did this for human ages, we would say that newborn babies are "1",
> meaning that they're in their first year.
Further discussion of this topic belongs in .off-topic.geek, I think. Let's
take it there if you want to continue. :)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: When should the 2000 Catalogue Appear?
|
| (...) Actually, that's exactly what I said. The first year was (retroactively of course) numbered "1", meaning "In the first year after our reference point". The year before that is "-1", meaning "In the first year before our reference point." We (...) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
