 | | Re: Lord of the Rings
|
| (...) buy (...) couldn't (...) You can't follow 53,409 names that all sorta sound similar after awhile? ;-) Try it again sometime, I bet you can follow it now. (...) I'm reading book 5 _A Horse and His Boy_ for the umpteenth time.. My favorites out (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Lord of the Rings
|
| (...) Time, dammit. I need more time! (...) Do you consider The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe the first book, or The Magician's Nephew? I always advise folk to read the former first. (...) 'preciate it. (...) Yeah, instead of a Lego Aslan, we (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Lord of the Rings
|
| (...) Ditto. It bugs me that they switched the numbering so that the Magician's Nephew is first -- if I'm not mistaken, it was originally book 6. Bits of that book just don't make any sense unless you read several books before it. (...) I'm there. (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Lord of the Rings
|
| (...) favorites (...) Yes! I don't like that either. I saw that and it made me wonder what those people were smoking. It seems like you can do anything with a dead author's books. Hey publisher: Read them (and sell them) in the order they were first (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Lord of the Rings
|
| Tom McDonald wrote: <snippage of valid criticism of spamcakehead publishers> (...) Ah yes, I think the kids and I shall read those next. I remember reading Perelandra with the radio on as a kid, and to this day when I hear "Living Thing" by ELO, I (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Lord of the Rings
|
| (...) Thing" (...) dreamiest:-) (...) I've never even thought of Jeff Lynne and CS Lewis in the same context. John, go check and make sure you're not using your gas stove as a heater again. :-) (...) get in (...) Just don't abuse it :-) Todd's (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Lord of the Rings
|
| (...) If those were the "lean years", the nineties must have been the "decidedly chubby" years. :-) -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
