To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 51402 (-10)
  Re: Set 10030 ("Imperial Star Destroyer") re-release comments
 
Hey Ryan, It is indeed a most impressive set, although as you figured out through painful trail and error, not the most transportable or even swooshable. It is gorgeous aesthetically, but structurally it' can become a nightmare. Don't keep it (...) (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Set 10030 ("Imperial Star Destroyer") re-release comments
 
(...) I'm curious about one thing - did any pieces actually BREAK in the crash? (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
 
  Re: 1962 Department Store Lego Christmas Display
 
(...) Thanks Allan, I know I have been promising the Lego CD for a while now, but it keeps getting bigger. It will exceed 700 pages, and that's only 1949-80. Volume 2 (1980-2005) will be bigger, but that will have to wait until Volume 1 is finished (...) (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: 1962 Department Store Lego Christmas Display
 
(...) That's a great picture! I was wondering what sort of photos you'd have in your book. Now I'm even more anxious to read it. :) Regards, Allan B. (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  1962 Department Store Lego Christmas Display
 
(URL) Christmas 1962, this photo was taken at Detroit's J.L. Hudson's Department Store, which was the 2nd largest department store in the world (after New York's Macy's store). This store window display shows the Samsonite Lego series of set, as (...) (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.general) ! 
 
  Re: Set 10030 ("Imperial Star Destroyer") re-release comments
 
(...) I had mine together for about 4 months, and there was a good amount of deflection in the 1x16 grey technic beams attached to the front support. It's been in the box for a little over 18 months now. When it goes back together, I'll be sure to (...) (19 years ago, 9-Aug-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Set 10030 ("Imperial Star Destroyer") re-release comments
 
(...) I remember a discussion about the Star Destroyer when it first came out recommending adding an additional support to the front of the ship through the "hatch". I believe someone had pieces of the "A-frame' shatter due to stress. Mine has long (...) (19 years ago, 9-Aug-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: PromoBricks.com needs your help! (Pictures of Lego stores)
 
(...) Yup - I check that page often. The pictures there are ok, but not really what I am looking for. I would really like to have original content and larger pictures than what Lego.com has. I have got a good response from this posting - thanks (...) (19 years ago, 8-Aug-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Set 10030 ("Imperial Star Destroyer") re-release comments
 
(...) Ryan, you are leaving a $300 Lego model at work.... er um.... is it secure there? Or will you come to work one morning with nothing but a few loose plates lying about because one of the night time cleaning crew took a fancy to it? Anyway, I (...) (19 years ago, 8-Aug-05, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Set 10030 ("Imperial Star Destroyer") re-release comments
 
(...) Hahaha, in the first pic, it actually looks like the ISD is flying... (towards the ground unfortunately). -Bryan (19 years ago, 8-Aug-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR