Subject:
|
Re: Set 10030 ("Imperial Star Destroyer") re-release comments
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:36:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1104 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Ryan Holtz wrote:
> Final judgement:
> + Looks absolutely amazing when finished
> + C'mon, it's Star Wars
> + Is fun to build
> + Comes with a fun informational decal with Imperial Star Destroyer statistics
> + Comes with another small model for a scale reference
>
> - Far too fragile
> - Still doesn't take very long to build for an advanced builder, so the fun of building is short-lived.
I remember a discussion about the Star Destroyer when it first came out recommending adding an additional support to the front of the ship through the "hatch". I believe someone had pieces of the "A-frame' shatter due to stress. Mine has long since been returned to the box, but at the time I measured the height of the 'A-frame' at the back and at the front and there was a significant difference.
Can anybody confirm the long-term effects of keeping the model assembled?
Kristine
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Set 10030 ("Imperial Star Destroyer") re-release comments
|
| Forgive me if this is a rehash of what was said three years ago when the original run of the set made its debut, but being as I was 17 then and I didn't have a job that paid well enough to feed my Lego addiction (or any job at all) at the time, I'm (...) (19 years ago, 7-Aug-05, to lugnet.general)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
