To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 49630
49629  |  49631
Subject: 
Re: Identifying AFOLs on LUGNET
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Tue, 23 Nov 2004 21:48:24 GMT
Viewed: 
3113 times
  
In lugnet.general, David Eaton wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Thomas Main wrote:
> > In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > > In lugnet.general, Gerhard R. Istok wrote:
> > > > What do you think?
> > > 
> > > I like the LEGO Geek Code better, it is more expressive. However it may be a
> > > bit harder to decode.
> > 
> > I agree.  And I seem to remember some talk a while back about creating a Lego
> > geek code parser.
> > 
> > For those who don't remember the Lego Geek code, check out:
> > 
> > http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Lofts/9639/lcodev22.txt
> 
> Way long ago in 2000 I made a parser (but not the probably-more-useful
> generator)...
> http://www.suave.net/~dave/lgc.cgi?func=translate
> http://www.suave.net/~dave/lgc.cgi
> 
> Given the way my code worked I had to switch the order of a couple things from
> Derek's version (actually, for DISPLAY purposes rather than PARSING purposes,
> which is shameful of me), and I added a few things (themes, etc) that weren't in
> his version, last updated in... uh... 1997 I guess? And of course mine needs
> revamping now, too, darn it all...
> 
> DaveE
> 
> LEGO: CA+++ SP+++ SW++++ #++++++ A+ CO+ LM- LS+++ MOC+ P+++++ S Hzl M+ VLv YB76m
> IC10

I don't know about the Geek code.  I think it would take less time to read
someones profile (personal info) in paragraph form that to try to translate a
Geek code into data one can understand.  You would always need a cheat sheet of
sorts, and it would be very easy to make a mistake and get someones profile
wrong. But that's only me.  Looks like some of you have the Geek Code down to a
science. :-)

Gary Istok



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Identifying AFOLs on LUGNET
 
(...) Heh, if LGC caught on, it'd probably slowly become second nature-- at least to the things you were interested in seeing. But I have to agree, it's very intimidating at first glance. Lots of symbols and wierdness floating around. Now, what (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Identifying AFOLs on LUGNET
 
(...) generator)... (URL) the way my code worked I had to switch the order of a couple things from Derek's version (actually, for DISPLAY purposes rather than PARSING purposes, which is shameful of me), and I added a few things (themes, etc) that (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)

12 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR