 | | Re: Announcing new Legend! —Gregory Muri
|
| | | I don't see this as ruining anything. I have read some very interesting posts with the direction this thread has gone. Some things have even given me perspective I had not previously considered. Why should you care, just don't read it! There are (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | (canceled) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Announcing new Legend! —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) That's it. Tell customer service what you think. As for the rest of us, we already know, cause you've already told us...and told us...and told us. -Tim (21 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Announcing new Legend! —Thomas Stangl
|
| | | | (...) But telling Consumer Affairs is telling it to a black hole. It does nothing. However, as Jake has noted, TLG employees read Lugnet. So stating it here again....and again...and again {might} finally make it sink in as to how important it is to (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Announcing new Legend! —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | (...) Jake has told me, and I believe he's told the group here on LUGNET, that Consumer Affairs *does* track this information and *does* relay it to the appropriate department. But, I suppose that might not be good enough for people who "can never (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Announcing new Legend! —Gregory Muri
|
| | | | | (...) nothing. (...) important (...) Well stated Tom! (21 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Announcing new Legend! —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | | "Tom Stangl, VFAQman" <talonts@vfaq.com> wrote in message news:409C2822.F2FCB9...faq.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) nothing. (...) important (...) [ ... snipped ... ] I disagree. There comes a point when saying the same thing over and over again (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego) !!
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Announcing new Legend! —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) Yup. Spotlighted. (21 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Announcing new Legend! —Walter Walters
|
| | | | | | (...) ... snipped ... (...) Now I disagree. While this may true for the readers at LUGNET, how much of this so-called "noise" is actually reaching TLG? No one at TLG (besides Jake) is reading all of these color-change complaints. Sometimes, when the (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Announcing new Legend! —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Wanna bet? I think you have *no idea* how many people at TLG do or don't read LUGNET, or where they sit in the corporate hierarchy, or whether the thread is actually doing more harm than good or not. I don't have much better info than you do, (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Announcing new Legend! —Jan-Albert van Ree
|
| | | | | | (...) I can most definately confirm this. Usually after posting links to/pictures of a new MOC I have hosted on my own websites visits coming from the lego.com domain start appearing usually the next day... (21 years ago, 9-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Announcing new Legend! —Anders Isaksson
|
| | | | (...) Maybe. It may also drive more and more people away from lugnet, as all the ranting is so infuriating to read. For the moment, lugnet is worse than having to listen to my two teenage boys quarreling. (Back to www.tt-forums.net for something (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | |
