 | | Re: New x-pod sets —Huw Millington
|
| | | I hadn't noticed until William Howard mentioned it, that the clear parts screw together as do the lid and base: (URL) Millington" <hmillington@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:HrnoDL.4Ls@lugnet.com... (...) new (...) The (...) appreciate (...) (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | New element (Was: Re: New x-pod sets) —Huw Millington
|
| | | | 4346 has two of an interesting new element Brick 1 x 1 with studs on two sides: (URL) should provide new possibilties for SNOT constructions. Huw "Huw Millington" <hmillington@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:HroKyq.LAv@lugnet.com... (...) a (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New element (Was: Re: New x-pod sets) —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | (...) Very interesting indeed! (...) I've often wondered why the 'studs on all sides' was the only configuration of this style of brick. (...) Absolutely. So if these sets have been available for so long (as noted below) at retail, I wonder why (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New element (Was: Re: New x-pod sets) —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | (...) Hey Allan, My understanding is that the 1x1 brick with stud on only one side is not produced by TLC because the patent (!) is still owned by Ritvik and used in MegaBloks. That's why they could only do the 1x4 like that, at least until the part (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New element (Was: Re: New x-pod sets) —Huw Millington
|
| | | | | | | £10 for the set of 4 and the strap. Mail me if you wish to meet up again... Huw "Mr L F Braun" <braunli1@pilot.msu.edu> wrote in message news:Hroxtu.sz5@lugnet.com... (...) configuration of (...) retail, I (...) today if I (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New element (Was: Re: New x-pod sets) —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | | | (...) You must have read my mind. It was, in fact, a 1x1 with a stud on one side that I was really thinking of. I will love to have and will use the piece Huw noted above, but it would also be nice to have one that didn't need any clearance on the (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New element (Was: Re: New x-pod sets) —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | (...) Eh, just back it up to a 1x1 or 1x2 technic brick with the peghole in the right place, and it's all good. But I agree that it would have been nicer to see a the megablok part rendered in "the good stuff" instead. (...) I do agree--still have (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New element (Was: Re: New x-pod sets) —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | | | (...) Or use a 1 x 1 Technic Brick with a half pin in the first place... :) (21 years ago, 19-Jan-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New element (Was: Re: New x-pod sets) —Huw Millington
|
| | | | "Allan Bedford" <ExpertBuilder-DELET...otome.com> wrote in message news:Hror1M.1nG4@lugnet.com... (...) retail, I (...) if I (...) They are due out, I think, around March, but Argos was selling them from yesterday, which is when their new catalogue (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New element (Was: Re: New x-pod sets) —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | (...) Huw, Thanks for the clarification. I reread the original posting and now see the meaning of: (...) I took that to mean that they had been in stock for several months (already) and that their general release was impending. :) Ooops. Thanks (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
