Subject:
|
Re: The largest LEGO box is?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 May 1999 03:31:20 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cmasi@cmasi.chem.tulane.edu(StopSpammers)
|
Viewed:
|
536 times
|
| |
|
|
Carbon 60 wrote:
I have been wondering for a while....why Carbon 60? Are you a big fan of
buckminster fullerenes? (See my email address to understand my curiosity.)
> Todd Lehman wrote:
> > I always thought that the largest LEGO set box was the 6991 Monorail
> > Transport Base. But we just bought a copy of an old SCALA set -- the 3290
> > family house. I don't have the 6991 box handy to measure for comparison,
> > but here are the box measurements for 3290:
> >
> > In U.S.: 24 7/8" x 19 1/4" x 6 1/2"
> > In Metric: 63 cm x 49 cm x 16.5 cm
>
> 6991 is a tiny box! I reckon that 6990 and 6399 Monorails were bigger -
23 3/8" x 17 3/4" x 4" for 6399 Airport Shuttle
22 7/8" x 18 1/4" x 3 7/8" for 6285 Black Sea's Barracuda
So, it looks like the girls got the biggest box. (please no hate mail). I could
apologize for being US centric with my measurements, but we all know 1 inch =
2.54 cm so feel free to do the math.
Chris
Oh, now I see you meant that 6991 is a small box, not 3290. Anyway, 3290 is
bigger than 6399 (I measured 6285 because it was the other big box that I
owned.)
>
> when I got mine in the post (6991) I thought how small it looked. Can
> you verify this? I have train 7740 - that's big.
>
> --
> Carbon 60
> ICQ # 5643170
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The largest LEGO box is?
|
| (...) 6991 is a tiny box! I reckon that 6990 and 6399 Monorails were bigger - when I got mine in the post (6991) I thought how small it looked. Can you verify this? I have train 7740 - that's big. (25 years ago, 28-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
