To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 4304
4303  |  4305
Subject: 
a short rant...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Sat, 22 May 1999 22:04:35 GMT
Reply-To: 
Mookie@Innocent+spamless+.com
Viewed: 
600 times
  
I've been meaning to mention this after the last Auczilla (1) auction..
and when there was the discussion about the outragous prices in the
auctions.. and I kept putting it off.. though again I fear this subject
is going to come up again when X ends because of the prices of some
items right now.. It seems there are some traders that feel they should
get the Auczilla (1) auction price for their trades yet don't believe in
paying the same prices for what's being traded.. If you want to go by
those standards... remember it goes both ways.. if you want to demand
top dollar, be prepared to pay top dollar for what you're trading.

Tamy
gets off her soap box now...

1. don't know where the TM should go..



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: a short rant...
 
Agreed, definitely. You either need to fully use the AS (AucZILLA Standard), or scrap it. It used to be that it was very useful. These days, with some pieces going for absolutely ludicrous prices, I can't comfortably use the AS anymore, as sometimes (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-99, to lugnet.general)
  Re: a short rant...
 
(...) Fully agreed. I generally prefer a trade of pieces I don't want but someone else does for pieces they don't want but I do. But if the "value" idea has to come into it, well, then both pieces ought to be valued using the same "price guide". If (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)

6 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR