Subject:
|
Re: New poll: how do you handle building interiors, backsides
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:26:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
437 times
|
| |
|
|
Bruce Hietbrink wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I figured I'd try putting up a poll for those of you who build buildings. I
> guess the main question I'm getting at is do you build buildings more for
> display (how they look as backdrop for your brickfilm or train layout or
> whatever), or more for functionality and playability, or somewhere in between.
> Anyway, here's the link:
> http://members.lugnet.com/polls/ballots/?n=168
>
> Or, you can just post a follow up to this telling me how flawed my poll is. ;)
> Or you could tell me, for instance, that the Scorpion Palace has a fully
> furnished interior (that was the one set I listed that I don't own), or suggest
> a set that has a furnished but inaccessible interior.
Decent poll, unfortunately you missed the option I use: Fully detailed
interiors with liftoff sections (I feel this generally actually works
better than swing out - swing out is nice for some things though - like
if you want to have ceiling detail).
Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New poll: how do you handle building interiors, backsides
|
| Bruce, Interiors are evil. Sometimes a necessary evil, but if you can't see it through a window, canopy, or orifice of some kind, I say boycott. Yeah, making something modular or hinged is cool, but in my experience irritating and too (...) (21 years ago, 9-Sep-03, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
