Subject:
|
Re: The Two Towers : New poster at www.rotule.qc.ca
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 01:00:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
385 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Terry Prosper wrote:
| |
Whaaaa?
I admit, I didn’t expect such hard ratings. I’m very doubtful that this postr
is *that* bad. So far, 4 persons have voted 0/10, which means that they think
it is absolutely horrible.
I’ve asked both my better-half and my best friend for their opinion on the
votes so far and on my poster. Here is their input :
Samaelle (wife): 10/10
Vincent (friend) : 9/10 “People who rated it 0 are just stupid, obviously.
While it’s not your best poster, it’s still very good. And “not your best
one” doesn’t mean a thing...because some of your other posters are awesome”
My personnal opinion : I think this poster is very good. I’d place it between
Fight Club (http://www.rotule.qc.ca/posters/showposter.cgi?fightclub) and
Harry Potter Chamber of
Secrets(http://www.rotule.qc.ca/posters/showposter.cgi?hpchamber)
But I will accept criticism. Vincent told me it’s got to much Photoshop
editing for his taste. Maybe that’s why this poster is not well rated? But
even so, rating it zero is pure stupidity. I’ve never rated a poster 0. The
worst poster I’ve rated got a 2 i think. I don’t think I would put a “0”
poster on my website anyway! :-)
PLMKWYT !!!!!
Terry
|
It’s not bad at all. While the characters are a little larger than the
original, the poster is pretty good. I’m rating it as either a 7 or 8.
-Dan
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The Two Towers : New poster at www.rotule.qc.ca
|
| Whaaaa? I admit, I didn't expect such hard ratings. I'm very doubtful that this postr is *that* bad. So far, 4 persons have voted 0/10, which means that they think it is absolutely horrible. I've asked both my better-half and my best friend for (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jun-03, to lugnet.general)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
