Subject:
|
Re: Question on LUGNET Set Listing - Combo Packs of sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 May 2003 21:27:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
422 times
|
| |
|
|
David Eaton wrote:
> In your own personal file this is stuff is easier to reflect. You might do
> something like:
>
> Set# Owned Theme Pieces Figs
> --------------------------------
> 6569 1 Polar 0 0
> 6578 1 Polar 21 1
> 6586 1 Polar 55 1
>
> Which denotes that you *own* a combo set, but won't go towards a piece/fig
> tally.
This is what I do in my set inventory, since I want a good estimate of
the number of pieces in my collection. Of course, honestly, it wouldn't
actually matter which way I do it since eBay and BrickLink purchases are
not inventoried, and thus my collection is significantly larger than the
set inventory will ever indicate.
Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Question on LUGNET Set Listing - Combo Packs of sets
|
| Frank & All, (...) I see. (...) Ah, Indeed. I remember the pictures you posted when you moved from the east coast out to the west coast (I don't remember details off hand, I have enough trouble keeping track of myself!) and all the stuff you had. : (...) (21 years ago, 14-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Question on LUGNET Set Listing - Combo Packs of sets
|
| (...) I guess the problem is what you're looking to do with the data. For accurate piece counts, you'd obviously want to just enter either the combo set number *OR* the individual sub-sets. That'd mean your piece counts would be accurate, your "My (...) (21 years ago, 14-May-03, to lugnet.general)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
