 | | Re: Divorce? —Kirby Warden
|
| | | All you had to do was say what you meant. But according to you the complainers are being childish because YOU chose all the wrong words to express this "sarcastic" vent? Don't blame us, all we did was read what you wrote. And despite what some may (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Divorce? —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | | (...) But Kirby, that’s the nature of ‘sarcasm!’ You choose all the “Wrong words” specifically in order to apply an inflection. The “wrong words,” when properly understood, are what create the humor! By explaining the nuances or by being stolidly (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Divorce? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) You are correct. However, others are also correct that sarcasm usually falls flat when expressed in written form. The problem is that without visual and audial clues from talking to a person in person there is no way to tell if the words are (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Divorce? —Kirby Warden
|
| | | | | (...) Sorry, i have to stick to my guns here. A very probable situation was described and a very realistic interaction took place between the two parties involved. Was he being sarcastic? If so, fine; I must've missed it. The only indication I have (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Divorce? —Terry Prosper
|
| | | | | | (...) I won't even answer your question. The fact is: people should not judge me on the mere facts I posted in my story. If you don't think I was sarcastic, that's your opinion, but nobody should have attacked me. Like I said, if you don't like my (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Divorce? —Terry Prosper
|
| | | | (...) Thanks Richard ! This thread has really got me down, but it's posts like yours that make LUGNET a happy place to be! Terry (22 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
